|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885, compare of GPUs Mali-G71 MP18 and Mali-T880 MP12. This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose) and Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, and how good the CPUs are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Exynos 8 Octa 8890 or Exynos 7 Octa 7885 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 8 Octa 8890 | 8% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 9% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 8 Octa 8890 | 54% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 8 Octa 8890 | 7% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 7% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 8 Octa 8890 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Total score | 123350 | 136471 | CPU | 34536 | 38211 | GPU | 46875 | 51853 | MEM | 19745 | 21835 | UX | 22212 | 24556 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 8 Octa 8890 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Single-Core | 252 | 279 | Multi-Core | 1110 | 1228 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 8 Octa 8890 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 26.82 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is 8% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7885 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T880 MP12 | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 265 | 334 | # of Cores | 12 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 24.9 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 47.5 | 26.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 50.4 | 37.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 26.3 | 34.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 43.5 | 25.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 61.7 | 37.7 | Real Racing 3 | 75.6 | 65.3 | Sniper 3D | 80.6 | 48.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 80.6 | 67.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 58 | 42.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 70.6 | 44.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.12/13 2/3 CA | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 600 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is better: 13 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|