 |
AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7232P |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7232P and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like RealBench, Handbrake, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, WPrime, Blender, Blender, 7zip, PassMark, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Furmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7232P or AMD EPYC 7702P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7702P | 70% |
EPYC 7232P | 55% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7702P is 21% better than EPYC 7232P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7702P | 80% |
EPYC 7232P | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 141.7 | 96.8 | Valorant | 161.1 | 110.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.2 | 61.6 | Apex Legends | 151.4 | 103.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 120.8 | 82.5 | Overwatch | 130.5 | 89.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.1 | 75.9 | DOOM Eternal | 80.5 | 55.0 | Warzone | 125.6 | 85.8 | Assassin's Creed | 135.3 | 92.4 | Valheim | 133.7 | 91.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7702P | 18% |
EPYC 7232P | 26% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7232P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7702P as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 120W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7232P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 198 | 211 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8182 | 1570 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 370 | 372 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18282 | 3480 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 1255 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 47555 | 9326 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7232P | Single-Core | 2135 | 1367 | Multi-Core | 66158 | 16608 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7232P | Single-Core | 1086 | 965 | Multi-Core | 52674 | 8637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7232P | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Rome | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 64 | 8 | Threads | 128 | 16 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 120 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 85 GByte/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 32MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000047 100-100000047WOF | 100-000000081 100-100000081WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7232P is 35% better than EPYC 7702P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702P has 56 more core than EPYC 7232P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7232P is better: 9 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7702P and AMD EPYC 7232P before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7232P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|