 |
AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9654P and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Gears 5, PCMark 10, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, MATLAB, Prime95, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, WPrime, UserBenchmark, PassMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or AMD EPYC 7702P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7702P | 70% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 28% better than EPYC 7702P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7702P | 80% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 141.7 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 161.1 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.2 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 151.4 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 120.8 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 130.5 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.1 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.5 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 125.6 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.3 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 133.7 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7702P | 18% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7702P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654P since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 198 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8182 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 370 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18282 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 47555 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2135 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 66158 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 1086 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 52674 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 96 | | Threads | 128 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000047
100-100000047WOF | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9654P is 16% better than EPYC 7702P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 32 more core than EPYC 7702P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 33
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7702P and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
