 |
AMD EPYC 7702P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6130T |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7702P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6130T tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, 3DMark, Furmark, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, SuperPi, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6130T or AMD EPYC 7702P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7702P | 70% |
Xeon Gold 6130T | 56% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7702P is 20% better than Xeon Gold 6130T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7702P | 80% |
Xeon Gold 6130T | 62% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 141.7 | 110.1 | | Valorant | 161.1 | 125.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.2 | 70.1 | | Apex Legends | 151.4 | 117.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 120.8 | 93.9 | | Overwatch | 130.5 | 101.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.1 | 86.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.5 | 62.6 | | Warzone | 125.6 | 97.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.3 | 105.1 | | Valheim | 133.7 | 103.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7702P | 18% |
Xeon Gold 6130T | 26% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6130T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7702P since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 198 | 161 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8182 | 2296 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 370 | 314 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18282 | 5359 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 762 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 47555 | 21485 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | | Single-Core | 2135 | 1681 | | Multi-Core | 66158 | 21868 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | | Single-Core | 1086 | 1004 | | Multi-Core | 52674 | 21694 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7702P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | | Core name | Rome | Skylake | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.1 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 16 | | Threads | 128 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 7510 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 125 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | | 768 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 22 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000047
100-100000047WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6130T is 4% better than EPYC 7702P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702P has 48 more core than Xeon Gold 6130T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6130T is better: 7
However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7702P and Intel Xeon Gold 6130T before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
