|
Intel Atom Z2520 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Intel Atom Z2520 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212, comparison of GPUs Adreno 302 and PowerVR SGX544. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the chips are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy Atom Z2520 or Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom Z2520 | 1% |
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom Z2520 | 14% |
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | 22% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom Z2520 | 1% |
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z2520 |
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | Total score | 11918 | 14552 | CPU | 3335 | 4066 | GPU | 4536 | 5528 | MEM | 1906 | 2333 | UX | 2154 | 2628 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z2520 |
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | Single-Core | 31 | 38 | Multi-Core | 145 | 177 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z2520 |
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.2 GHz Cloverview | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR 2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 333 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Atom Z2520 has 2 more core than Snapdragon 200 MSM8212. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX544 | Adreno 302 | GPU Frequency | 533 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 17.06 | 19.2 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 24 | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 960 x 540 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.2 | 3.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 9.8 | 10.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 5.3 | 6.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 5.9 | 5.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 7.7 | 8.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 11.5 | 13.4 | Real Racing 3 | 9.3 | 9.8 | Sniper 3D | 10.1 | 10.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 9.5 | 9.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 6.9 | 9.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 6.9 | 7.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | | Download speed | 72 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is better: 24 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Atom Z2520 and Snapdragon 200 MSM8212, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom Z2520 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|