Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Atom Z2520 vs Spreadtrum SC9832 benchmark which processor is better

Intel Atom Z2520 vs Spreadtrum SC9832

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z2520 vs Spreadtrum SC9832, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR SGX544.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and Spreadtrum SC9832 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Octane V2, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Atom Z2520 or Spreadtrum SC9832 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

 
Intel Atom Z2520
Spreadtrum SC9832

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Atom Z25201% Spreadtrum SC98321%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Atom Z252014% Spreadtrum SC983230%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Atom Z25201% Spreadtrum SC98321%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Atom Z2520 Spreadtrum SC9832
Total score1191822092
CPU33356178
GPU45368392
MEM19063534
UX21543986

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Atom Z2520 Spreadtrum SC9832
Single-Core3158
Multi-Core145270

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Atom Z2520 Spreadtrum SC9832
Frequency1200 MHz1300 MHz
Cores24
Bit6432
Lithography32 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.2 GHz Cloverview4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2
Max. Memory2 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency1066266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9832 is 7% better than Atom Z2520 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom Z2520 has 2 more core than Spreadtrum SC9832. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR SGX544Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency533 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS17.068.4
# of Cores12
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile3.23.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)9.815.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra5.39.5
Call of Duty: Mobile5.98.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)7.712.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition11.520.1
Real Racing 39.319
Sniper 3D10.115.2
Need for Speed No Limits9.513.3
Mortal Kombat X6.915.2
CSR Racing 26.911.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemIntel XMM 7160
Upload speed6 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832 is better: 23
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Atom Z2520 and Spreadtrum SC9832, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom Z2520 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Spreadtrum SC9832 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Atom Z2520 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Spreadtrum SC9832 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands