|
Intel Atom Z2520 vs MediaTek MT6580P |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z2520 vs MediaTek MT6580P, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and MT6580P is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Atom Z2520 or MT6580P and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z2520 |
MT6580P | Total score | 11918 | 20298 | CPU | 3335 | 5679 | GPU | 4536 | 7718 | MEM | 1906 | 3247 | UX | 2154 | 3656 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z2520 |
MT6580P | Single-Core | 31 | 53 | Multi-Core | 145 | 248 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z2520 |
MT6580P | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.2 GHz Cloverview | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580P is 7% better than Atom Z2520 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom Z2520 has 2 more core than MT6580P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX544 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 533 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 17.06 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.2 | 4.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 9.8 | 15.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 5.3 | 9.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 5.9 | 7.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 7.7 | 11.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 11.5 | 19.3 | Real Racing 3 | 9.3 | 13.7 | Sniper 3D | 10.1 | 14.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 9.5 | 10.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 6.9 | 10.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 6.9 | 11.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | | Navigation | | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580P is better: 24 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Atom Z2520 and MT6580P, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom Z2520 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
MT6580P SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
| |
|