|
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 vs Samsung Exynos 850 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom x5-Z8550 vs Samsung Exynos 850, comparison of GPUs Mali-G52 MP6 and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell). This performance comparison includes two processors: Atom x5-Z8550 is quad-core (SoFIA) and Exynos 850 is octa-core (Cortex-A55). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Octane V2, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Geekbench, and how good the processors are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Atom x5-Z8550 or Exynos 850 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom x5-Z8550 | 5% |
Exynos 850 | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom x5-Z8550 | 56% |
Exynos 850 | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom x5-Z8550 | 2% |
Exynos 850 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom x5-Z8550 |
Exynos 850 | Total score | 73756 | 119144 | CPU | 20655 | 33358 | GPU | 28035 | 45266 | MEM | 11795 | 19058 | UX | 13276 | 21445 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom x5-Z8550 |
Exynos 850 | Single-Core | 190 | 243 | Multi-Core | 859 | 1072 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom x5-Z8550 |
Exynos 850 | Frequency | 1440 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.44-2.4 GHz SoFIA | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 512 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 850 is 28% better than Atom x5-Z8550 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom x5-Z8550 has 4 more core than Exynos 850. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 134 | 426 | # of Cores | 16 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 23.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.3 | 45.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.7 | 48.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.8 | 25.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.6 | 41.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.8 | 59.6 | Real Racing 3 | 55.4 | 85.2 | Sniper 3D | 44.3 | 107.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 49.9 | 58.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 44.3 | 70.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 36 | 58.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 22 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.13 5CA/Cat.15 2CA | Download speed | 21 MBit/s. | 400 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8550 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 850 is better: 30 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Atom x5-Z8550 and Exynos 850, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom x5-Z8550 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Exynos 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|