|
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 vs Qualcomm 215 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8550 vs Qualcomm 215, speed testing of GPUs Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and Adreno 308. This performance comparison includes two processors: Atom x5-Z8550 is quad-core (SoFIA) and Qualcomm 215 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Atom x5-Z8550 or Qualcomm 215 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom x5-Z8550 | 5% |
Qualcomm 215 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom x5-Z8550 | 56% |
Qualcomm 215 | 36% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom x5-Z8550 | 2% |
Qualcomm 215 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom x5-Z8550 |
Qualcomm 215 | Total score | 73756 | 45671 | CPU | 20655 | 12790 | GPU | 28035 | 17354 | MEM | 11795 | 7309 | UX | 13276 | 8215 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom x5-Z8550 |
Qualcomm 215 | Single-Core | 190 | 121 | Multi-Core | 859 | 558 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom x5-Z8550 |
Qualcomm 215 | Frequency | 1440 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.44-2.4 GHz SoFIA | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 677 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom x5-Z8550 is 9% better than Qualcomm 215 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) | Adreno 308 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 134 | 27 | # of Cores | 16 | | # of Shader Units | | 24 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 14.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.3 | 37.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.7 | 25.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.8 | 22.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.6 | 31.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.8 | 47.9 | Real Racing 3 | 55.4 | 51.8 | Sniper 3D | 44.3 | 57 | Need for Speed No Limits | 49.9 | 41.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 44.3 | 29.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 36 | 33.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Download speed | 21 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8550 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm 215 is better: 11 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Atom x5-Z8550 and Qualcomm 215, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom x5-Z8550 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Qualcomm 215 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
| |
|