 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Furmark, PassMark, Blender, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Gears 5, 7zip, 3DMark, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 58% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | 60% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is 3% better than Ryzen 5 7640HS. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 56% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 98.5 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 112.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 62.7 | | Apex Legends | 105.8 | 105.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 84.0 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 90.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 77.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 56.0 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 87.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 94.0 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 92.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 138% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | 147% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 7640HS since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 319 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2800 | 3089 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 743 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6661 | 6772 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1063 | 1844 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18264 | 18847 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | | Single-Core | 2220 | 4117 | | Multi-Core | 29440 | 34073 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1544 | | Multi-Core | 10864 | 10313 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FP7 | | Core name | Phoenix | Rembrandt | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 6 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 7200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | 384KB | 512KB | | L2 cache | 6MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000956 (FP7r2)
100-000000965 (FP7)
100-000001130 (FP8)
| FP7: 100-000000541 FP7r2: 100-000000563 |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 7640HS is 23% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 7640HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is better: 12
Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
