 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, RealBench, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, PassMark, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 58% |
Ryzen 9 4900HS | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 7640HS is 3% better than Ryzen 9 4900HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 56% |
Ryzen 9 4900HS | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 96.2 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 109.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 61.2 | | Apex Legends | 105.8 | 102.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 82.0 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 88.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 75.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 54.7 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 85.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 91.8 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 90.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 138% |
Ryzen 9 4900HS | 118% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 7640HS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 4900HS as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 200 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2800 | 1918 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 495 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6661 | 4315 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1063 | 1246 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18264 | 11006 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | | Single-Core | 2220 | 2636 | | Multi-Core | 29440 | 19763 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1239 | | Multi-Core | 10864 | 8032 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FP6 | | Core name | Phoenix | Renoir | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 6 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 8600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) | | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 6MB | | | L3 cache | 16MB | | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000956 (FP7r2)
100-000000965 (FP7)
100-000001130 (FP8)
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 7640HS is 30% better than Ryzen 9 4900HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 7640HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is better: 8
However, it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
