|
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as UserBenchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, MATLAB, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Gears 5, WPrime, SuperPi, RealBench, Furmark, Prime95, 3DMark, 7zip. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 7640HS | 58% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 55% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 7640HS is 5% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 7640HS | 56% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.1 | 96.3 | Valorant | 112.6 | 109.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 61.3 | Apex Legends | 105.8 | 102.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 82.1 | Overwatch | 91.2 | 88.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 75.5 | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 54.7 | Warzone | 87.8 | 85.4 | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 91.9 | Valheim | 93.5 | 90.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 7640HS | 138% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 87% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 7640HS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 4800HS since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 197 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2800 | 1712 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 472 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6661 | 3847 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1063 | 1235 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18264 | 10590 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Single-Core | 2220 | 2605 | Multi-Core | 29440 | 18943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Single-Core | 1875 | 1185 | Multi-Core | 10864 | 8153 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 06, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FP6 | Core name | Phoenix | Renoir | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | Generation | 6 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 5400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 6MB | 4MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000956 (FP7r2) 100-000000965 (FP7) 100-000001130 (FP8)
| 100-000000098
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 7640HS is 32% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 7 4800HS has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 7640HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is better: 7 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|