 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i9-9880H |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i9-9880H and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Blender, SuperPi, PassMark, RealBench, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, 3DMark, Handbrake, AIDA64, Blender, WPrime.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9880H or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 58% |
Core i9-9880H | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 7640HS is 6% better than Core i9-9880H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 56% |
Core i9-9880H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 95.4 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 108.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 60.7 | | Apex Legends | 105.8 | 101.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 81.3 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 87.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 74.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 54.2 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 84.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 91.0 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 90.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 138% |
Core i9-9880H | 82% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 7640HS is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9880H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i9-9880H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 191 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2800 | 1535 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 447 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6661 | 3462 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1063 | 1162 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18264 | 8311 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i9-9880H | | Single-Core | 2220 | 2554 | | Multi-Core | 29440 | 14080 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i9-9880H | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1118 | | Multi-Core | 10864 | 7238 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i9-9880H | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Phoenix | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 8600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 6MB | | | L3 cache | 16MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000956 (FP7r2)
100-000000965 (FP7)
100-000001130 (FP8)
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 7640HS is 46% better than Core i9-9880H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9880H has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 7640HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9880H is better: 8
However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and Intel Core i9-9880H before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-9880H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
