 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i7-11850H |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i7-11850H and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Prime95, Blender, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, MATLAB, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 7zip, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, SuperPi, WPrime, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11850H or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 58% |
Core i7-11850H | 57% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 7640HS is 1% better than Core i7-11850H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 56% |
Core i7-11850H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 96.7 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 109.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 61.6 | | Apex Legends | 105.8 | 103.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 82.5 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 89.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 75.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 55.0 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 85.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 92.3 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 91.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 138% |
Core i7-11850H | 130% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 7640HS is more energy efficient than the Core i7-11850H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 40W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 313 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2800 | 2281 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 747 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6661 | 5178 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1063 | 1749 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18264 | 17071 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Single-Core | 2220 | 4095 | | Multi-Core | 29440 | 23900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1563 | | Multi-Core | 10864 | 8575 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | March 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Phoenix | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 40 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 6MB | | | L3 cache | 16MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000956 (FP7r2)
100-000000965 (FP7)
100-000001130 (FP8)
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 7640HS is 41% better than Core i7-11850H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-11850H has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 7640HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11850H is better: 11
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and Intel Core i7-11850H before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-11850H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
