 |
AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 9274F |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 9274F and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, RealBench, SuperPi, Prime95, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Furmark, WPrime, PassMark, 3DMark, AIDA64, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9274F or AMD EPYC 9354P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9354P | 70% |
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9354P is 1% better than EPYC 9274F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9354P | 75% |
EPYC 9274F | 73% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 132.6 | 129.7 | | Valorant | 150.6 | 147.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.4 | 82.5 | | Apex Legends | 141.6 | 138.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.0 | 110.5 | | Overwatch | 122.0 | 119.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 103.9 | 101.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.3 | 73.7 | | Warzone | 117.5 | 114.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 126.5 | 123.8 | | Valheim | 125.0 | 122.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9354P | 26% |
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9274F since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 320W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 154 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8374 | 7827 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 350 | 321 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 17783 | 16627 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 911 | 846 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46297 | 43295 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Single-Core | 2087 | 1946 | | Multi-Core | 67926 | 63524 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Single-Core | 2223 | 2073 | | Multi-Core | 43685 | 40852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.25 MHz | 4.05 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 24 | | Threads | 64 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 320 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000805
100-100000805WOF | 100-000000794
100-000000794WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 19% better than EPYC 9354P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9354P has 8 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 2
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9354P and AMD EPYC 9274F before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
