 |
AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 9274F |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 9274F and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Handbrake, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, RealBench, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Blender, Prime95.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9274F or AMD EPYC 9474F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9474F | 77% |
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9474F is 10% better than EPYC 9274F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9474F | 85% |
EPYC 9274F | 73% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 150.1 | 129.7 | | Valorant | 170.6 | 147.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.5 | 82.5 | | Apex Legends | 160.3 | 138.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 127.9 | 110.5 | | Overwatch | 138.1 | 119.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 117.7 | 101.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 85.3 | 73.7 | | Warzone | 133.0 | 114.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 143.3 | 123.8 | | Valheim | 141.6 | 122.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9474F | 16% |
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9474F since it has less power consumption: 360W vs. 320W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 246 | 154 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 11139 | 7827 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 484 | 321 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 23633 | 16627 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1229 | 846 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 61496 | 43295 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Single-Core | 2790 | 1946 | | Multi-Core | 90217 | 63524 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Single-Core | 1762 | 2073 | | Multi-Core | 60869 | 40852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9474F |
AMD EPYC 9274F | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.05 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 24 | | Threads | 96 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 320 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000788
100-000000788WOF | 100-000000794
100-000000794WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 11% better than EPYC 9474F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9474F has 24 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9474F and AMD EPYC 9274F before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9474F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
