 |
AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7542 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7542 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PCMark 10, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, Gears 5, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, WPrime, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, 7zip, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7542 or AMD EPYC 7642.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7642 | 68% |
EPYC 7542 | 67% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7642 is 1% better than EPYC 7542. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7642 | 73% |
EPYC 7542 | 76% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 134.8 | | Valorant | 147.3 | 153.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 85.8 | | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 144.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 114.9 | | Overwatch | 119.3 | 124.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 105.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 76.6 | | Warzone | 114.9 | 119.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 128.7 | | Valheim | 122.3 | 127.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7642 | 13% |
EPYC 7542 | 16% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7542 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 177 | 174 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7594 | 7016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 443 | 419 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16104 | 14867 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 844 | 789 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 41890 | 38654 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Single-Core | 2404 | 2227 | | Multi-Core | 61546 | 56789 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Single-Core | 918 | 1098 | | Multi-Core | 40836 | 45863 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 32 | | Threads | 96 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000074
100-100000074WOF | 100-000000075
100-100000075WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7542 is 20% better than EPYC 7642 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7642 has 16 more core than EPYC 7542. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 15
All the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7642 and AMD EPYC 7542 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
