 |
AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 7532 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 7532 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Prime95, WPrime, Blender, 3DMark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, Handbrake, SuperPi, PassMark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7532 or AMD EPYC 7542.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7542 | 67% |
EPYC 7532 | 67% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7542 | 76% |
EPYC 7532 | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.8 | 133.3 | | Valorant | 153.2 | 151.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.8 | 84.9 | | Apex Legends | 144.0 | 142.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.9 | 113.6 | | Overwatch | 124.1 | 122.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.7 | 104.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.6 | 75.8 | | Warzone | 119.5 | 118.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.7 | 127.3 | | Valheim | 127.1 | 125.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7542 | 16% |
EPYC 7532 | 19% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7532 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7542 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7532 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 174 | 171 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7016 | 6988 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 419 | 415 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14867 | 14812 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 789 | 785 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 38654 | 38514 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7532 | | Single-Core | 2227 | 2217 | | Multi-Core | 56789 | 56494 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7532 | | Single-Core | 1098 | 1146 | | Multi-Core | 45863 | 44451 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7532 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 32 | | Threads | 64 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000075
100-100000075WOF | 100-000000136
100-000000136WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7542 is 17% better than EPYC 7532 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7532 is better: 3
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7542 and AMD EPYC 7532 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7532 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
