 |
AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 9474F |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 9474F and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, WPrime, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, AIDA64, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Blender, Furmark, PCMark 10, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9474F or AMD EPYC 7542.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7542 | 67% |
EPYC 9474F | 77% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9474F is 12% better than EPYC 7542. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7542 | 76% |
EPYC 9474F | 85% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Control, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.8 | 150.1 | | Valorant | 153.2 | 170.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.8 | 95.5 | | Apex Legends | 144.0 | 160.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.9 | 127.9 | | Overwatch | 124.1 | 138.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.7 | 117.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.6 | 85.3 | | Warzone | 119.5 | 133.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.7 | 143.3 | | Valheim | 127.1 | 141.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7542 | 16% |
EPYC 9474F | 16% |
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 174 | 246 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7016 | 11139 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 419 | 484 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14867 | 23633 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 789 | 1229 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 38654 | 61496 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Single-Core | 2227 | 2790 | | Multi-Core | 56789 | 90217 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Single-Core | 1098 | 1762 | | Multi-Core | 45863 | 60869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 48 | | Threads | 64 | 96 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000075
100-100000075WOF | 100-000000788
100-000000788WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9474F is 19% better than EPYC 7542 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9474F has 16 more core than EPYC 7542. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 33
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7542 and AMD EPYC 9474F before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9474F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
