 |
AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 9654P |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 9654P tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, 3DMark, RealBench, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PassMark, Gears 5, 7zip, MATLAB, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or AMD EPYC 9354P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9354P | 70% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 28% better than EPYC 9354P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9354P | 75% |
EPYC 9654P | 98% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 132.6 | 173.9 | | Valorant | 150.6 | 197.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.4 | 110.7 | | Apex Legends | 141.6 | 185.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.0 | 148.2 | | Overwatch | 122.0 | 160.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 103.9 | 136.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.3 | 98.8 | | Warzone | 117.5 | 154.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 126.5 | 166.0 | | Valheim | 125.0 | 164.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9354P | 26% |
EPYC 9654P | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654P since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 469 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8374 | 19565 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 350 | 887 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 17783 | 41479 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 911 | 2185 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46297 | 107871 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2087 | 4612 | | Multi-Core | 67926 | 158238 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Single-Core | 2223 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 43685 | 84216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 9654P | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.25 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 96 | | Threads | 64 | 192 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000805
100-100000805WOF | 100-000000803
100-100000803WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9354P is 26% better than EPYC 9654P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 64 more core than EPYC 9354P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 24
However, it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9354P and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
