 |
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9354P |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9354P tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as 7zip, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Blender, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, 3DMark, PassMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9354P or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 9354P | 70% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9374F is 1% better than EPYC 9354P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 9354P | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.3 | 132.6 | | Valorant | 152.7 | 150.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 84.4 | | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 141.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 113.0 | | Overwatch | 123.7 | 122.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 103.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 75.3 | | Warzone | 119.1 | 117.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 126.5 | | Valheim | 126.7 | 125.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 9354P | 26% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9374F as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 170 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 8374 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 350 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 17783 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 911 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 46297 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Single-Core | 2177 | 2087 | | Multi-Core | 70650 | 67926 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Single-Core | 2319 | 2223 | | Multi-Core | 45439 | 43685 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9354P | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 3.25 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 32 | | Threads | 64 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000792
100-100000792WOF | 100-000000805
100-100000805WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 15% better than EPYC 9354P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 1
Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 9354P before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
