 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 505 and Adreno 506. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 429 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon SiP1 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 429 or Snapdragon SiP1 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 429 | 4% |
Snapdragon SiP1 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 429 | 64% |
Snapdragon SiP1 | 61% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 429 | 2% |
Snapdragon SiP1 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 429 |
Snapdragon SiP1 | Total score | 65308 | 66906 | CPU | 18278 | 18732 | GPU | 24823 | 25415 | MEM | 10456 | 10704 | UX | 11762 | 12038 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 429 |
Snapdragon SiP1 | Single-Core | 169 | 173 | Multi-Core | 760 | 779 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 429 |
Snapdragon SiP1 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x1.48GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 6.4 | 10 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 128 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 429 is 9% better than Snapdragon SiP1 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 429 has 4 more core than Snapdragon SiP1. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 505 | Adreno 506 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 48 | 130 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 48 | 96 | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.2 | 13.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 23.7 | 23.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 16.5 | 15.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.6 | 10.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 15.6 | 14.2 | Real Racing 3 | 47.4 | 46.6 | Sniper 3D | 30.8 | 30.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 33.2 | 32.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 27.3 | 33.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 30.8 | 28 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X6 LTE modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X9 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 75 MBit/s. | 100 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 is better: 26 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 429 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Snapdragon SiP1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|