|
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio G35 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300, comparison of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) and PowerVR GE8320. This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio G35 is octa-core (Cortex-A53) and Atom x5-Z8300 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Helio G35 or Atom x5-Z8300 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio G35 | 7% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio G35 | 66% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 54% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio G35 | 5% |
Atom x5-Z8300 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio G35 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | Total score | 110404 | 62268 | CPU | 30918 | 17437 | GPU | 41961 | 23658 | MEM | 17655 | 9967 | UX | 19881 | 11201 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio G35 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | Single-Core | 225 | 161 | Multi-Core | 993 | 725 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio G35 |
Atom x5-Z8300 | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 1440 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x1.44-1.84 GHz SoFIA | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio G35 is 37% better than Atom x5-Z8300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio G35 has -4 more core than Atom x5-Z8300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 96 | # of Cores | 2 | 16 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.6 | 13.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 42.2 | 22.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.5 | 14.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 21.6 | 10.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 27.8 | 14.9 | Real Racing 3 | 84.4 | 40.1 | Sniper 3D | 92.8 | 36.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 76 | 41.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 48.5 | 36.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.6 | 29.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | A-GOLD 620 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G35 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is better: 4 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Helio G35 and Atom x5-Z8300, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio G35 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Atom x5-Z8300 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|