|
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Helio G95 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Helio G95, compare of GPUs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 and PowerVR GM 9446. This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Helio G95 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Octane V2, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Tiger T710 or Helio G95 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T710 | 18% |
Helio G95 | 22% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T710 | 64% |
Helio G95 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T710 | 17% |
Helio G95 | 19% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T710 |
Helio G95 | Total score | 256330 | 308396 | CPU | 71765 | 86348 | GPU | 97406 | 117182 | MEM | 41022 | 49333 | UX | 46147 | 55511 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T710 |
Helio G95 | Single-Core | 563 | 690 | Multi-Core | 2030 | 2348 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T710 |
Helio G95 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2050 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.05 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 10 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio G95 is 2% better than Tiger T710 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GM 9446 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 247.35 | 279 | # of Cores | 3 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.3 | 29.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.5 | 53.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.1 | 47.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.7 | 40.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.1 | 44.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.1 | 65.9 | Real Racing 3 | 68.4 | 94.6 | Sniper 3D | 50.8 | 104.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 70.4 | 56.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 45 | 54.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.8 | 52 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G95 is better: 27 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Tiger T710 and Helio G95, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T710 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Helio G95 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|