|
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Samsung Exynos 980 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Samsung Exynos 980, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GM 9446 and Mali-G76 MP5. This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 980 is octa-core (Cortex-A77). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Octane V2, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Tiger T710 or Exynos 980 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T710 | 18% |
Exynos 980 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T710 | 64% |
Exynos 980 | 72% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T710 | 17% |
Exynos 980 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T710 |
Exynos 980 | Total score | 256330 | 236563 | CPU | 71765 | 66232 | GPU | 97406 | 89891 | MEM | 41022 | 37840 | UX | 46147 | 42582 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T710 |
Exynos 980 | Single-Core | 563 | 487 | Multi-Core | 2030 | 1951 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T710 |
Exynos 980 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 980 is 9% better than Tiger T710 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GM 9446 | Mali-G76 MP5 | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 247.35 | 217 | # of Cores | 3 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3360 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.3 | 27.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.5 | 30.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.1 | 56.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.7 | 37.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.1 | 23.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.1 | 35.1 | Real Racing 3 | 68.4 | 71.1 | Sniper 3D | 50.8 | 108.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 70.4 | 102.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 45 | 91 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.8 | 68.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | 5G NR Sub, LTE Cat.16 5CA/Cat.18 2CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 2055 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 1280 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 980 is better: 19 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Tiger T710 and Exynos 980, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T710 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 980 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|