Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Unisoc Tiger T710

Comparisons   17-02-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Unisoc Tiger T710, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy QCS8250 or Tiger T710.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

QCS8250

49%

Tiger T710

18%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

QCS8250

77%

Tiger T710

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

QCS8250

48%

Tiger T710

17%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	QCS8250	Tiger T710
Total score	683050	256330
CPU	191262	71765
GPU	259548	97406
MEM	109285	41022
UX	122956	46147

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	QCS8250	Tiger T710
Single-Core	1073	563
Multi-Core	3756	2030

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	QCS8250	Tiger T710
Frequency	2850 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.85 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	16 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2750	1066
Memory bandwidth	44	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS8250 is 29% better than Tiger T710 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 650	PowerVR GM 9446
GPU Frequency	645 MHz	970 MHz
GFloPS	1348	247.35
# of Cores		3
# of Shader Units	512
Display	3840 x 2160 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.4	27.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	82.7	45.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	49.2	39.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	44.4	35.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	69.6	41.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	101.5	58.1
Real Racing 3	86.5	68.4
Sniper 3D	64.9	50.8
Need for Speed No Limits	59.2	70.4
Mortal Kombat X	65.3	45
CSR Racing 2	60.9	50.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 480	Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS	60	30
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G	LTE-7
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3000 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, GNSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, GLONASS, QZSS	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS8250 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

QCS8250 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS8250 specs and review.

Tiger T710 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T710 specs and review.