Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR GM 9446 and Adreno 619L.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 690 5G is octa-core (Kryo 560). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Quadrant, Octane V2, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, GFXBench, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Fortnite etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Tiger T710 or Snapdragon 690 5G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T710

18%

Snapdragon 690 5G

24%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T710

64%

Snapdragon 690 5G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T710

17%

Snapdragon 690 5G

21%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T710	Snapdragon 690 5G
Total score	256330	339723
CPU	71765	95116
GPU	97406	129086
MEM	41022	54361
UX	46147	61145

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T710	Snapdragon 690 5G
Single-Core	563	760
Multi-Core	2030	2587

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T710	Snapdragon 690 5G
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4x (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	1866
Memory bandwidth	29	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GM 9446	Adreno 619L
GPU Frequency	970 MHz	975 MHz
GFloPS	247.35	486
# of Cores	3
# of Shader Units		316
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.3	24.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	45.5	55.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	39.1	45.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	35.7	41.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	41.1	45.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	58.1	71.4
Real Racing 3	68.4	80.3
Sniper 3D	50.8	59.7
Need for Speed No Limits	70.4	82.6
Mortal Kombat X	45	66.6
CSR Racing 2	50.8	59.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Vivi Magic	Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	30	240
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-7	Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	900 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Tiger T710 and Snapdragon 690 5G, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Tiger T710 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T710 specs and review.

Snapdragon 690 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 690 5G specs and review.