Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T710

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T710, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GM 9446 and Apple A14 Bionic.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: A14 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm) and Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like AnTuTu, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy A14 Bionic or Tiger T710 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A14 Bionic

41%

Tiger T710

18%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A14 Bionic

78%

Tiger T710

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A14 Bionic

38%

Tiger T710

17%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A14 Bionic	Tiger T710
Total score	571583	256330
CPU	160050	71765
GPU	217206	97406
MEM	91462	41022
UX	102894	46147

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A14 Bionic	Tiger T710
Single-Core	1621	563
Multi-Core	4180	2030

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A14 Bionic	Tiger T710
Frequency	3000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	12 nm
Transistors count	11800000 millions
Core configuration	8x3 GHz Icestorm 4x1.8 GHz Firestorm	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	1066
Memory bandwidth	42.7	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		256 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 33% better than Tiger T710 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A14 Bionic has 2 more core than Tiger T710. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Apple A14 Bionic	PowerVR GM 9446
GPU Frequency	3000 MHz	970 MHz
GFloPS	1480	247.35
# of Cores	4	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2732 x 2048 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.8	27.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	60.9	45.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.3	39.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	57.5	35.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.5	41.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	74.8	58.1
Real Racing 3	98.5	68.4
Sniper 3D	73.2	50.8
Need for Speed No Limits	67.6	70.4
Mortal Kombat X	73.2	45
CSR Racing 2	67.6	50.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	12 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	12 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Apple ISP	Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS	960	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Snapdragon X60 5G	LTE-7
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3000 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs A14 Bionic and Tiger T710, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

A14 Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• A14 Bionic specs and review.

Tiger T710 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T710 specs and review.