|
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Samsung Exynos 9810 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Samsung Exynos 9810, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G72 MP18 and PowerVR GM 9446. This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 9810 is octa-core (Exynos M3 Mongoose). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the CPUs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T710 or Exynos 9810 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T710 | 18% |
Exynos 9810 | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T710 | 64% |
Exynos 9810 | 63% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T710 | 17% |
Exynos 9810 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T710 |
Exynos 9810 | Total score | 256330 | 214536 | CPU | 71765 | 60078 | GPU | 97406 | 81523 | MEM | 41022 | 34334 | UX | 46147 | 38617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T710 |
Exynos 9810 | Single-Core | 563 | 442 | Multi-Core | 2030 | 1770 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T710 |
Exynos 9810 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.9 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 26.82 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9810 is 31% better than Tiger T710 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GM 9446 | Mali-G72 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 247.35 | 519.97 | # of Cores | 3 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.3 | 19.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.5 | 39.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 39.1 | 45.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 35.7 | 35.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.1 | 34.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.1 | 49.9 | Real Racing 3 | 68.4 | 79.8 | Sniper 3D | 50.8 | 73 | Need for Speed No Limits | 70.4 | 63.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 45 | 73 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.8 | 50.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | LTE Cat.13/18 2/5 CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9810 is better: 16 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Tiger T710 and Exynos 9810, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T710 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 9810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|