Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 540 and PowerVR GM 9446.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 is octa-core (Kryo 280). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Octane V2, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Tiger T710 or Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

 
Unisoc Tiger T710
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T71018% Snapdragon 835 MSM899812%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T71064% Snapdragon 835 MSM899863%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T71017% Snapdragon 835 MSM899810%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T710 Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
Total score256330171349
CPU7176547987
GPU9740665116
MEM4102227406
UX4614730849

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T710 Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
Single-Core563421
Multi-Core20301475

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T710 Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
Frequency2000 MHz2600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8x2.45 GHz Kryo 280
Power consumption (TDP)5 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency10661866
Memory bandwidth2929.8
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.1-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 is 23% better than Tiger T710 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR GM 9446Adreno 540
GPU Frequency970 MHz710 MHz
GFloPS247.35566.61
# of Cores3
# of Shader Units384
Display2160 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.322.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)45.527.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra39.157.3
Call of Duty: Mobile35.729.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)41.123.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition58.132.7
Real Racing 368.4100.3
Sniper 3D50.874.5
Need for Speed No Limits70.480.2
Mortal Kombat X4591.7
CSR Racing 250.874.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution48 MP32 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi MagicQualcomm Spectra 180
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7Qualcomm Snapdragon X16 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 is better: 16
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T710 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Tiger T710 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands