Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, comparison of GPUs Mali-G71 MP20 and Mali-G52 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like PassMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, Octane V2, AnTuTu, PCMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T610 or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T610

12%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

12%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T610

67%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T610

11%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T610	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score	169746	176074
CPU	47534	49309
GPU	64512	66905
MEM	27164	28174
UX	30555	31689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T610	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core	278	488
Multi-Core	917	1515

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T610	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency	1800 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	1866
Memory bandwidth	29	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.1-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 21% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G52 MP2	Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency	614 MHz	546 MHz
GFloPS	302.51	371.2
# of Cores	2	20
# of Shader Units
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	21.7	23.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	26.5	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.9	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.2	30.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.7	24.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	31.7	33.5
Real Racing 3	85.4	73.5
Sniper 3D	91	94.1
Need for Speed No Limits	79.7	82.3
Mortal Kombat X	74	94.1
CSR Racing 2	62.6	82.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-7	LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 29
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Tiger T610 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Tiger T610 specs and review.

Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 9 Octa 8895 specs and review.