MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-G71 MP20.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio G35 is octa-core (Cortex-A53) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, Octane V2, PassMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Helio G35 or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio G35

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

12%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio G35

66%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio G35

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio G35	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score	110404	176074
CPU	30918	49309
GPU	41961	66905
MEM	17655	28174
UX	19881	31689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio G35	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core	225	488
Multi-Core	993	1515

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio G35	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency	2300 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz	1866
Memory bandwidth	14.9	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache		64 KB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	546 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	371.2
# of Cores	2	20
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		23.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	25.6	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	42.2	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.5	30.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	21.6	24.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	27.8	33.5
Real Racing 3	84.4	73.5
Sniper 3D	92.8	94.1
Need for Speed No Limits	76	82.3
Mortal Kombat X	48.5	94.1
CSR Racing 2	50.6	82.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	25 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G35 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 30
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Helio G35 and Exynos 9 Octa 8895, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio G35 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• Helio G35 specs and review.

Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 9 Octa 8895 specs and review.