Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, comparison of GPUs Adreno 530 and Mali-G52 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is quad-core (Kryo 280). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Octane V2, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of chips in Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Tiger T610 or Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.


 
Unisoc Tiger T610
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T61012% Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T61067% Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro54%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T61011% Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro9%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T610 Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Total score169746149901
CPU4753441975
GPU6451256961
MEM2716423984
UX3055526987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T610 Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Single-Core278306
Multi-Core9171349

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T610 Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Frequency1800 MHz2400 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Kryo 280
Power consumption (TDP)9 W11 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory8 Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency10661866
Memory bandwidth2929.8
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache2 MB3 MB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.1-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is 25% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Tiger T610 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G52 MP2Adreno 530
GPU Frequency614 MHz650 MHz
GFloPS302.51518.73
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units256
Display2160 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile21.727.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)26.526.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra56.953.8
Call of Duty: Mobile28.228.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)22.721.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition31.737.2
Real Racing 385.494.2
Sniper 3D9169.9
Need for Speed No Limits79.764.6
Mortal Kombat X7478
CSR Racing 262.659.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP28 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is better: 20
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Tiger T610 and Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T610 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Tiger T610 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands