|
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus, comparison of GPUs Adreno 512 and Mali-G52 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is quad-core (Kryo 280). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Tiger T610 or Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T610 | 12% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T610 | 67% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T610 | 11% |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | 6% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T610 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Total score | 169746 | 113847 | CPU | 47534 | 31874 | GPU | 64512 | 43265 | MEM | 27164 | 18217 | UX | 30555 | 20499 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T610 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Single-Core | 278 | 232 | Multi-Core | 917 | 1024 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T610 |
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 280 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 29.8 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is 18% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Tiger T610 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 512 | GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 302.51 | 255 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.7 | 22.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 43.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 46.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.2 | 24.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.7 | 39.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 57.8 | Real Racing 3 | 85.4 | 58.1 | Sniper 3D | 91 | 74.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.7 | 65.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 74 | 74.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.6 | 51.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus is better: 16 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T610 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|