|
Helio P40 vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio P40 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-G71 MP20. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P40 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as AnTuTu, Neocore, PassMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Helio P40 or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P40 | 8% |
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 | 12% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P40 | 60% |
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P40 | 6% |
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 | 9% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P40 |
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 | Total score | 119691 | 176074 | CPU | 33517 | 49309 | GPU | 45482 | 66905 | MEM | 19153 | 28174 | UX | 21542 | 31689 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P40 |
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 | Single-Core | 244 | 488 | Multi-Core | 1077 | 1515 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P40 |
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 13% better than Helio P40 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G71 MP20 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 161 | 371.2 | # of Cores | 3 | 20 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 24.9 | 23.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 46.9 | 27.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 49.9 | 58.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 26.5 | 30.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 42.3 | 24.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 60.1 | 33.5 | Real Racing 3 | 99.8 | 73.5 | Sniper 3D | 109.8 | 94.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 69.9 | 82.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 79.8 | 94.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.9 | 82.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P40 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 24 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio P40 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|