Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T7520

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T7520, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G57 MP6 and Mali-G52 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Tiger T7520 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Octane V2, PassMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T610 or Tiger T7520 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

 
Unisoc Tiger T610
Unisoc Tiger T7520

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T61012% Tiger T752017%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T61067% Tiger T752078%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T61011% Tiger T752016%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T610 Tiger T7520
Total score169746236686
CPU4753466278
GPU6451289949
MEM2716437865
UX3055542609

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T610 Tiger T7520
Single-Core278488
Multi-Core9171952

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T610 Tiger T7520
Frequency1800 MHz2200 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)9 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency10661066
Memory bandwidth2929
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.1-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T7520 is 18% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G52 MP2Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency614 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS302.51846
# of Cores26
# of Shader Units
Display2160 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile21.726.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)26.530.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra56.955.6
Call of Duty: Mobile28.236.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)22.722.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition31.734.9
Real Racing 385.469.5
Sniper 3D91122.3
Need for Speed No Limits79.789
Mortal Kombat X7463.9
CSR Racing 262.677.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP100 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7Makalu IVY510 5G
Download speed300 MBit/s.8000 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.4000 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T7520 is better: 30
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T610 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Tiger T7520 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Tiger T610 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Tiger T7520 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands