Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, compare of GPUs Adreno 620 and Mali-G52 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 765G is octa-core (Kryo 475 Prime). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Tiger T610 or Snapdragon 765G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T610

12%

Snapdragon 765G

21%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T610

67%

Snapdragon 765G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T610

11%

Snapdragon 765G

19%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T610	Snapdragon 765G
Total score	169746	304160
CPU	47534	85154
GPU	64512	115588
MEM	27164	48671
UX	30555	54738

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T610	Snapdragon 765G
Single-Core	278	681
Multi-Core	917	2316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T610	Snapdragon 765G
Frequency	1800 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	8 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	2133
Memory bandwidth	29	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.1-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 765G is 25% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G52 MP2	Adreno 620
GPU Frequency	614 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	302.51	896
# of Cores	2
# of Shader Units		384
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	21.7	31.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	26.5	55.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.9	62.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.2	40.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.7	51.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	31.7	75.6
Real Racing 3	85.4	93.8
Sniper 3D	91	137.5
Need for Speed No Limits	79.7	112.5
Mortal Kombat X	74	100
CSR Racing 2	62.6	75

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	22 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	30	60
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-7	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G is better: 34
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Tiger T610 and Snapdragon 765G, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Tiger T610 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Tiger T610 specs and review.

Snapdragon 765G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 765G specs and review.