|
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 980 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 980, compare of GPUs Mali-G52 MP2 and Mali-G76 MP5. This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 980 is octa-core (Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Octane V2, Quadrant, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Tiger T610 or Exynos 980 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T610 | 12% |
Exynos 980 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T610 | 67% |
Exynos 980 | 72% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T610 | 11% |
Exynos 980 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T610 |
Exynos 980 | Total score | 169746 | 236563 | CPU | 47534 | 66232 | GPU | 64512 | 89891 | MEM | 27164 | 37840 | UX | 30555 | 42582 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T610 |
Exynos 980 | Single-Core | 278 | 487 | Multi-Core | 917 | 1951 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T610 |
Exynos 980 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 980 is 18% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G76 MP5 | GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 302.51 | 217 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3360 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.7 | 27.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 30.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 56.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.2 | 37.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.7 | 23.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 35.1 | Real Racing 3 | 85.4 | 71.1 | Sniper 3D | 91 | 108.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.7 | 102.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 74 | 91 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.6 | 68.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | 5G NR Sub, LTE Cat.16 5CA/Cat.18 2CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 2055 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 1280 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 980 is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T610 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 980 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|