|
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G52 MP2 and Adreno 619. This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 750G is octa-core (Kryo 570). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like AnTuTu, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Tiger T610 or Snapdragon 750G and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T610 | 12% |
Snapdragon 750G | 23% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T610 | 67% |
Snapdragon 750G | 76% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T610 | 11% |
Snapdragon 750G | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T610 |
Snapdragon 750G | Total score | 169746 | 324969 | CPU | 47534 | 90989 | GPU | 64512 | 123496 | MEM | 27164 | 51999 | UX | 30555 | 58484 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T610 |
Snapdragon 750G | Single-Core | 278 | 727 | Multi-Core | 917 | 2475 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T610 |
Snapdragon 750G | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 750G is 18% better than Tiger T610 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 619 | GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 302.51 | 712 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 320 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.7 | 27.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 57.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 62.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.2 | 39.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.7 | 50.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 77.8 | Real Racing 3 | 85.4 | 110.1 | Sniper 3D | 91 | 138.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.7 | 75.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 74 | 100.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.6 | 69.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10, HLG |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 1200 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NavIC, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T610 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G is better: 33 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T610 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 750G SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
| |
|