MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, comparison of GPUs Mali-G71 MP20 and Mali-G57 MC1.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 600 5G is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Octane V2, PassMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Dimensity 600 5G or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 600 5G

15%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

12%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 600 5G

76%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 600 5G

13%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 600 5G	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score	215034	176074
CPU	60204	49309
GPU	81704	66905
MEM	34403	28174
UX	38700	31689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 600 5G	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core	443	488
Multi-Core	1774	1515

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 600 5G	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency	2000 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	12 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1866
Memory bandwidth	13	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	320 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 13% better than Dimensity 600 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC1	Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	546 MHz
GFloPS		371.2
# of Cores		20
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	20.8	23.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	40.5	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	46.4	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	36.1	30.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.8	24.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	50.1	33.5
Real Racing 3	69.6	73.5
Sniper 3D	74.2	94.1
Need for Speed No Limits	55.7	82.3
Mortal Kombat X	67.3	94.1
CSR Racing 2	51	82.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	500 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 16
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 600 5G specs and review.

Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 9 Octa 8895 specs and review.