MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, comparison of GPUs Mali-G57 MC2 and Mali-G71 MP20.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 700 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 700 or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 700

20%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

12%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 700

76%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 700

19%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 700	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score	285883	176074
CPU	80048	49309
GPU	108632	66905
MEM	45749	28174
UX	51452	31689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 700	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core	640	488
Multi-Core	2177	1515

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 700	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency	2200 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	12 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1866
Memory bandwidth	17.07	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		64 KB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 4% better than Dimensity 700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	546 MHz
GFloPS	486	371.2
# of Cores	2	20
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.8	23.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	46.4	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	45.5	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	38.9	30.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	36.1	24.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	59.9	33.5
Real Racing 3	56.9	73.5
Sniper 3D	100.1	94.1
Need for Speed No Limits	63.7	82.3
Mortal Kombat X	72.8	94.1
CSR Racing 2	50.1	82.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	500 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 700 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 14
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Dimensity 700 and Exynos 9 Octa 8895, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 700 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 700 specs and review.

Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 9 Octa 8895 specs and review.