|
Snapdragon 636 vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T), speed examination of GPUs Mali-T880 MP2 and Adreno 509. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 636 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Helio P25 (MT6757T) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Quadrant, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 636 or Helio P25 (MT6757T) and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 636 | 7% |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 636 | 57% |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | 49% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 636 | 6% |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 636 |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | Total score | 98787 | 63651 | CPU | 27664 | 17812 | GPU | 37543 | 24191 | MEM | 15797 | 10184 | UX | 17777 | 11466 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 636 |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | Single-Core | 255 | 164 | Multi-Core | 1150 | 741 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 636 |
Helio P25 (MT6757T) | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB | Memory Frequency | 1333 | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 32 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 (MT6757T) is 30% better than Snapdragon 636 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 509 | Mali-T880 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz | GFloPS | 178 | 68 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 128 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 21.8 | 12.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 37.1 | 22.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.1 | 14.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 18.5 | 10.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.2 | 13.5 | Real Racing 3 | 74.2 | 27.6 | Sniper 3D | 48.2 | 48.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 44.5 | 30.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 59.4 | 25.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 40.8 | 24.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | | Download speed | 600 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) is better: 11 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Snapdragon 636 and Helio P25 (MT6757T), and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 636 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Helio P25 (MT6757T) SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|