|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 vs MediaTek Helio A25 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 vs MediaTek Helio A25, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Adreno 430. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57) and Helio A25 is octa-core (Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Vellamo, Octane V2, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 or Helio A25 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 810 MSM8994 | 5% |
Helio A25 | 6% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 | 38% |
Helio A25 | 67% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 810 MSM8994 | 4% |
Helio A25 | 4% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 |
Helio A25 | Total score | 74144 | 95484 | CPU | 20750 | 26741 | GPU | 28176 | 36292 | MEM | 11867 | 15269 | UX | 13352 | 17181 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 |
Helio A25 | Single-Core | 191 | 247 | Multi-Core | 863 | 1112 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 |
Helio A25 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 20 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 4GB Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | 10 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 is 9% better than Helio A25 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 430 | PowerVR GE8320 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 421.2 | 126.8 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 256 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.4 | 20.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.2 | 35.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.8 | 22.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.9 | 17.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.9 | 21.3 | Real Racing 3 | 40.8 | 62 | Sniper 3D | 35.4 | 56.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 38.1 | 63.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 35.4 | 51.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.4 | 46 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 55 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X10 LTE modem | | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A25 is better: 24 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Helio A25 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|