|
MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs MediaTek Helio A25 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs MediaTek Helio A25, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-T880 MP4. This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X25 (MT6797T) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Helio A25 is octa-core (Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as PassMark, Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, and how good the chips are in games Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Helio X25 (MT6797T) or Helio A25 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio X25 (MT6797T) | 6% |
Helio A25 | 6% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio X25 (MT6797T) | 41% |
Helio A25 | 67% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio X25 (MT6797T) | 5% |
Helio A25 | 4% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio X25 (MT6797T) |
Helio A25 | Total score | 93545 | 95484 | CPU | 26196 | 26741 | GPU | 35553 | 36292 | MEM | 14960 | 15269 | UX | 16833 | 17181 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio X25 (MT6797T) |
Helio A25 | Single-Core | 242 | 247 | Multi-Core | 1089 | 1112 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio X25 (MT6797T) |
Helio A25 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 10 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 20 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.55 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4GB Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X25 (MT6797T) is 28% better than Helio A25 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X25 (MT6797T) has -2 more core than Helio A25. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T880 MP4 | PowerVR GE8320 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 115.51 | 126.8 | # of Cores | 4 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 19.8 | 20.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 34.9 | 35.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 21.1 | 22.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 16.4 | 17.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 20.3 | 21.3 | Real Racing 3 | 61.1 | 62 | Sniper 3D | 66.3 | 56.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 55.8 | 63.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 55.8 | 51.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 41.9 | 46 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) is better: 12
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A25 is better: 20 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio X25 (MT6797T) SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Helio A25 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|