Comparisons 21-06-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro vs Apple A14 Bionic, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro or A14 Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
A14 Bionic | 96% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
A14 Bionic | 92% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
A14 Bionic | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro |
A14 Bionic | | Total score | 897135 | 571583 | | CPU | 268491 | 177628 | | GPU | 334895 | 207069 | | MEM | 153388 | 110157 | | UX | 139755 | 101843 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro |
A14 Bionic | | Single-Core | 1251 | 1621 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 4180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro |
A14 Bionic | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | 11800000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1
3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 8x3 GHz Icestorm
4x1.8 GHz Firestorm | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 6 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 42.7 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro has -2 more core than A14 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Apple A14 Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 3000 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 1480 | | # of Cores | | 4 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 60.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 56.3 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 57.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 47.5 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 74.8 | | Real Racing 3 | | 98.5 | | Sniper 3D | | 73.2 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 67.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 73.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 67.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Snapdragon X60 5G | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A14 Bionic
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
