Comparisons 21-06-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro or Kirin 820 5G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
Kirin 820 5G | 74% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
Kirin 820 5G | 76% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
Kirin 820 5G | 71% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 820 5G | | Total score | 897135 | 371861 | | CPU | 268491 | 118605 | | GPU | 334895 | 124845 | | MEM | 153388 | 69518 | | UX | 139755 | 59014 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 820 5G | | Single-Core | 1251 | 802 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 2727 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 820 5G | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2360 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1
3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.36 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.22 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 31.78 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is 21% better than Kirin 820 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MP6 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 846 | | # of Cores | | 6 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 57.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 39.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 48.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 74.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 71.4 | | Sniper 3D | | 90.4 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 66.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 54.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 57.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 48 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 24 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | 21 | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 3400 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 25
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 820 5G
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Apple A12X Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
|
