Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Apple A14 Bionic benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Apple A14 Bionic

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Apple A14 Bionic, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6300 or A14 Bionic.

 
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Apple A14 Bionic

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Dimensity 630020% A14 Bionic41%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Dimensity 630086% A14 Bionic78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Dimensity 630018% A14 Bionic38%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 A14 Bionic
Total score447637571583
CPU125333160050
GPU170107217206
MEM7161491462
UX80574102894

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 A14 Bionic
Single-Core9041621
Multi-Core22054180

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 A14 Bionic
Frequency2400 MHz3000 MHz
Cores86
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm5 nm
Transistors count11800000 millions
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8x3 GHz Icestorm
4x1.8 GHz Firestorm
Power consumption (TDP)10 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4X
Max. Memory12 Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency21334266
Memory bandwidth17.0742.7
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 19% better than MediaTek Dimensity 6300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MediaTek Dimensity 6300 has -2 more core than A14 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MC2Apple A14 Bionic
GPU Frequency950 MHz3000 MHz
GFloPS4861480
# of Cores24
# of Shader Units
Display2520 x 1080 pixels2732 x 2048 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.928.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)56.460.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra58.456.3
Call of Duty: Mobile42.757.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)49.347.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition75.774.8
Real Racing 373.298.5
Sniper 3D128.873.2
Need for Speed No Limits81.967.6
Mortal Kombat X84.673.2
CSR Racing 264.467.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP12 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP12 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS240960
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCDolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9


Networks and Navigation
Modem3GPP R16 5G Multi-ModeSnapdragon X60 5G
Download speed3300 MBit/s.7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed1500 MBit/s.3000 MBit/s.
NavigationNavIC, Galileo E1+E5a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+B2a, QZSS L1CA+L5NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 30
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
A14 Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm QCM5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3


A14 Bionic SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 875
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Apple A14 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm QCM5430
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands