|
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G90T |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G90T, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 and Apple A14 Bionic. This performance comparison involves two processors: A14 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm) and Helio G90T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Octane V2, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy A14 Bionic or Helio G90T and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA14 Bionic | 41% |
Helio G90T | 20% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A14 Bionic | 78% |
Helio G90T | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA14 Bionic | 38% |
Helio G90T | 18% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A14 Bionic |
Helio G90T | Total score | 571583 | 279795 | CPU | 160050 | 78342 | GPU | 217206 | 106315 | MEM | 91462 | 44760 | UX | 102894 | 50359 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A14 Bionic |
Helio G90T | Single-Core | 1621 | 615 | Multi-Core | 4180 | 2216 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A14 Bionic |
Helio G90T | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2050 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 11800000 millions | | Core configuration | 8x3 GHz Icestorm 4x1.8 GHz Firestorm | 2x2.05 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 10 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 42.7 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 31% better than Helio G90T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A14 Bionic has 2 more core than Helio G90T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Apple A14 Bionic | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 | GPU Frequency | 3000 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 1480 | 248 | # of Cores | 4 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.8 | 31.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 60.9 | 50.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.3 | 44.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 57.5 | 39.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 47.5 | 46.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 74.8 | 65.4 | Real Racing 3 | 98.5 | 66.6 | Sniper 3D | 73.2 | 57.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 67.6 | 53.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 73.2 | 64.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 67.6 | 53.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 12 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 12 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Snapdragon X60 5G | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 33
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G90T is better: 7 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs A14 Bionic and Helio G90T, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A14 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Apple A14 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Helio G90T SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|