Comparisons 21-06-2021
Full comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2100, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro or Exynos 2100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
Exynos 2100 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
Exynos 2100 | 95% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
Exynos 2100 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Exynos 2100 | | Total score | 897135 | 672647 | | CPU | 268491 | 194890 | | GPU | 334895 | 273522 | | MEM | 153388 | 105982 | | UX | 139755 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Exynos 2100 | | Single-Core | 1251 | 1321 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 4216 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Exynos 2100 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2910 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1
3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Pro is 3% better than Exynos 2100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP14 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 976 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 78.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 98.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 83 | | Sniper 3D | | 90.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 75.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 54.5 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 22
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
|
