Comparisons 17-05-2022 Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Apple A14 Bionic, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100 or A14 Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 97% |
A14 Bionic | 96% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 89% |
A14 Bionic | 92% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 92% |
A14 Bionic | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
A14 Bionic | Total score | 785369 | 571583 | CPU | 163368 | 177628 | GPU | 139627 | 207069 | MEM | 106600 | 110157 | UX | 93142 | 101843 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
A14 Bionic | Single-Core | 1157 | 1621 | Multi-Core | 4056 | 4180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
A14 Bionic | Frequency | 2850 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 11800000 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x3 GHz Icestorm 4x1.8 GHz Firestorm | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 42.7 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 640 KB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 5% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8100 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MediaTek Dimensity 8100 has -2 more core than A14 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Apple A14 Bionic | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 3000 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 1480 | # of Cores | 6 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 60.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 56.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 57.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 47.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 74.8 | Real Racing 3 | | 98.5 | Sniper 3D | | 73.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 67.6 | Mortal Kombat X | | 73.2 | CSR Racing 2 | | 67.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 12 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 960 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Snapdragon X60 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5 | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Snapdragon 875 Vs A14 Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
|